From Forbes:
Let’s accept an unemployed woman bring upwards living lone amongst 2 children betwixt vi too 10 years old. In 2010, at that spot were 284,445 French families inwards this province of affairs that were on welfare.
This woman bring upwards volition move given the “Active Solidarity Income.” Since she has 2 children, the amount volition move $1,100. If she is renting an story amongst a $650 rent, she volition move given the “Housing Customized Aid,” amounting to $620. Then she volition have “Family Allowances,” which amounts to to a greater extent than or less other $160. Finally, let’s add together the payment known equally “Allowance for the offset of the schoolhouse year,” which is $750 i time a year, or $62.50 per month. (She powerfulness fifty-fifty create goodness from other aids, simply these are the close common.) She volition move given a full of $1,942.50 per month.
Now imagine that this woman bring upwards has flora move too volition move paid the “legal minimum wage,” which amounts to $1,820 gross—or $1,430 afterward taxes. Since she would move earning $1,430, she volition no longer have the “Active Solidarity income.” Her “Housing Customized Aid” volition move lowered to $460, simply she volition all the same move given “Family Allowances” too the “Allowance for the offset of the schoolhouse year.” Therefore, her full income volition amount to $2,112.50....
For this woman bring upwards of two, working over again volition convey her household unit of measurement an additional income of exclusively $170. Moreover, this $170 is probable to move lost inwards the toll of shipping to work, since the toll of gas inwards French Republic is $7 per gallon. In whatever case, such a pocket-size amount of coin is non an incentive to become dorsum to work. Between staying abode too working, the choice is simple: welfare is a meliorate deal.Sumber https://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/
