Paul Krugman responds to mankiw.blogspot.com/2014/03/not-class-warfare-optimal-taxation">my post about a recent column of his. He is right that not all economists handgrip that depression majuscule taxation is desirable; he appropriately cites Diamond as well as Saez, who are on the high-capital-tax side of this debate. FYI, here is some other recent paper, written inwards business office equally a reply to Diamond as well as Saez, which finds that optimal rates of majuscule taxation, piece positive, are quite low.
But that is non really the issue. If Paul had said "reasonable economists disagree, here are the arguments, as well as hither is why I tend to favor ane side rather than the other" I would non accept objected. Instead, inwards his master copy column, he wrote equally if in that place were no reasonable arguments for the policy pursued yesteryear the Bush administration, as well as he attributed the most vile motives to those who advanced the policy.
This episode illustrates a substitution departure betwixt Paul as well as me. I elbow grease non to assume the worst inwards other people, but because they disagree amongst me. Sumber https://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/
But that is non really the issue. If Paul had said "reasonable economists disagree, here are the arguments, as well as hither is why I tend to favor ane side rather than the other" I would non accept objected. Instead, inwards his master copy column, he wrote equally if in that place were no reasonable arguments for the policy pursued yesteryear the Bush administration, as well as he attributed the most vile motives to those who advanced the policy.
This episode illustrates a substitution departure betwixt Paul as well as me. I elbow grease non to assume the worst inwards other people, but because they disagree amongst me. Sumber https://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/
